Joe Trace's Engagement with Cyclical Temporality

Even the face of the clock and the way it functions—the instrument we use to measure time—implies just how valued cyclical temporality is to humans.

As mentioned in About Time, Paul Davies recognizes the interest in and discussion of cyclical time across numerous cultures and eras. So what is it that draws humans to this concept? The want to break from linear timeline? Is it the want to be more than human—timeless like the gods? Is it an excuse to escape from reality or the “time” we experience and must live with in the present?

Whatever the case may be, the concept of cyclical temporality has long been a topic of interest explored within both scientific and humanities fields. Toni Morrison’s Jazz grapples with the above ideas through both the characters’ experiences and the narration style itself. The narrator addresses readers about life:

I started out believing that life was made just so the world would have some way to think about itself, but that it had gone awry with humans because flesh, pinioned by misery, hangs on to it with pleasure[…] I don’t believe that anymore. Something is missing there. Something rogue. Something else you have to figure in before you can figure it out. (227-28)

Perhaps what humans have always needed to “figure in” in order to “figure it out” is the ability to experience time cyclically somehow to make connections and relations between these experiences that life consists of. Plato suggests that “the fleeting world of daily experience is only half real, an ephemeral reflection of a timeless domain” (Davies 24). It seems we search for this timelessness in cyclical patterns as a means to understanding reality, or the “fleeting world” we see before us. In some ways being always somehow “stuck” in the present can feel constricting, intimidating, even controlling.

In Jazz, readers are told the story of Joe Trace (and others) through cyclical narration. (For the purposes this essay, we’ll be focusing specifically on Mr. Trace.) The narrator refuses to expose their experiences in a linear fashion or recount those experiences in their entirety at one time. We are given bits and pieces of information, flashes of memories that return again and again in different contexts and points in Violet and Joe’s “reality,” or current place in time.

Joe Trace describes reality as a musical track, or more specifically and aptly associated, a jazz track. He expresses that no matter how hard we try, we are stuck on this track of life experiences, a track of our own reality that, like jazz, feels improvised and continually unexpected. Reality brings us the highs and lows of experience just as jazz provides a wide range of notes and melodies within a song.

Cyclical temporality allows us to step outside of this track, outside of time, and reflect on memories and experiences that mean the most to us. Davies quotes Mircea Eliade by stating that humans yearn “for a periodical return to the mythological time of the beginning of things” and later that perhaps the attraction to cyclical temporality is “the prospect of resurrection in subsequent cycles” (28-29). This most certainly seems true for Joe, as the narrator brings us through these cycles of experiences that Joe is so enthralled with and seems to have a hard time making any meaning of: his “wild” mother, his deteriorating relationship with his wife, his short-lived fling with Dorcas, his changing jobs and locations.

Over again, Joe ruminates cyclically on these experiences, wondering how and why he got to where he is (trying to "figure it out"), perhaps hoping for some sort of resurrection from the life he is now living, the musical track he is eternally bound to. Cycling through these experiences, however, often leads him to make similar decisions later, which can be seen in his attempt to reconnect with his wife, in his blossoming interest for Dorcas’ young friend, and in his major life changes (he confesses there to have been at least seven of them so far). This leads Joe to realize that even though he can cycle through these experiences and attempt to gain clarity and timelessness, he still is, just as we all are, “bound to the track” (Morrison 120).

Davies, Paul. About Time: Einstein’s Unfinished Revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995. Print.

Morrison, Toni. Jazz. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1992. Print.

Jazz as Narrative Structure

Jazz as Narrative Structure

            Last year, I read and taught Toni Morrison’s short story “Recitatif” for the first time. The title is a variation on recitative, a singing style mostly specific to opera in which the plot is moved forward by singing that “mimics natural speech.” Morrison wrote the story, the only short story that she has ever published, in an attempt to write a story without any reference to race. The title does not reflect any musical talent or aspirations for either girl; instead, Morrison mimics natural speech and historical events in an unidentifying way that causes the reader to ponder the race—Caucasian or African-American—of each girl. The plot moves forward through the narration over the course of many years without ever revealing the answer.

            The publication of “Recitatif” in 1983, almost ten years before the publication of Jazz, would point to the short story as a first, or first successful, attempt at utilizing a musical style to create a narrative style. Although references are made to record albums, dancing, and some people playing music, Jazz, much like “Recitatif,” does not center around the music as an integral plot point. Exploring the definition and characteristics of jazz music, one finds qualities that sound like the narrator and the additional voices telling the story.

            Most references indicate that jazz music is less of a quantitative style and more of a feeling; according to Lenora Zenzalai Helm, one knows that a musical piece is jazz when it has two required elements; the first element is swing that is created by a walking bass line. Helm describes this as a sound that is walking away, but as she demonstrates in the video, this bass line is the underpinning of the music and what provides the feel of the swing element that differentiates jazz from other musical styles. In Morrison’s novel Jazz, this walking bass line is the unnamed first-person omniscient narrator who seems to witness many of the events or be the recipient of the witnesses’ accounts. The underpinning of this narrator’s bass line gives the reader swing; in the opening chapter, the narrator describes New York City: “A city like this one make me dream tall and feel in on things. Hep” (7). The reader straightens to feel tall and realizes that the emotions expressed in the novel will not be limited to the characters but will also include the narrator’s emotions. The reader does not know what emotions the narrator has, just that emotions exist and will cause feeling, will cause swing. The pacing of the narrator’s voice is also part of the element of the bass line: “Here comes the new. Look out. There goes the sad stuff. The bad stuff. The things-nobody-could-help stuff. The way everybody was then and there. Forget that. History is over, you all, and everything’s ahead at last” (7). Reading these lines aloud, one cannot help reading them rhythmically, emphasizing the repetition, just as those low bass notes may not carry the melody, but they are evident, dropping emphasis that the ear picks up on. A bass line is part of the music but not the melody, just as Morrison’s bass line narrator is part of the tale but the action.

            Most references also describe jazz as a sound; you know it when you hear it. The Thelonious Monk Institute for Jazz points out that “[j]azz musicians strive to have their own, personal sound (tone) on their instrument” (click on the audio snippets at the bottom of the page to hear how each musician plays the same instrument with personal sound), which is also evident in the later part of Morrison’s novel. The bass line narrator cannot relate the melody of Dorcas’s death; rather Dorcas relates her final evening in a first-person narration related by the narrator (189-193). The bass line narrator also allows Felice to relate her version of Dorcas’s death and Felice’s subsequent relationship with the Traces in her own voice (198-216). It is interesting to note that the narrator could not tell the stories of the two seventeen-year-old girls. Just as two saxophone players will create different sounds in their playing, the two girls sound different. One is sly and conniving; the other is wholesome and straightforward. Not only are the events surrounding the girls reflective of their differences, even with Dorcas’s overlapping death scene, but the girls’ word choice, tone, attitude, and intents are all different even though they are played on the same instrument (a seventeen-year-old African-American girl living in Harlem). The Thelonious Monk Institute describes sounds as possibly “raspy, edgy, rough, smooth, pretty, soulful, warm, dark, light, harsh, or any one of dozens of other descriptions including combinations of descriptions and an infinite number of nuances –just like the human voice.” No two jazz sounds the same.  

            The second required element, according to Helm, is improvisation. The Thelonious Monk Institute of Jazz describes improvisation as “doing, saying, playing, or singing something extemporaneously, that is, not planned ahead of time” and compares it to “musical conversation” (be sure to click on the link for the jazz/conversation analogy sheet). The musician must interact with the music to, as described by Helm, spontaneously compose in a very structured way. In the opening lines of chapter six, the True Belle and Golden Gray chapter, the narrator states, “Risky, I’d say, trying to figure out anybody’s state of mind. But worth the trouble if you’re like me—curious, inventive, and well-informed” (137). The only people who would know the stories of True Belle and Golden Gray are those two, and they are not characters in the 1926 present day of the book. So the narrator has improvised. Based on information he or she has learned through the 1926 characters, the narrator has spontaneously created, within the structures provided by the histories of the characters, possible backgrounds. More importantly, the narrator admits to this improvisation, and, since this narration is jazz, the reader should expect improvisation.

            To allow for improvisation within a piece, each musician is given time for an improvised solo although “not everyone has to take a solo.” As in description of jazz’s form, the piece begins with one united chorus, everything is up for grabs in the center, and the piece ends with one united chorus. In chapter one of Jazz, the unnamed narrator describes New York City and the events that have brought the characters together—Dorcas’s death and the breaks from normalcy suffered by both Violet and Joe. Each character is then given time to solo—to have one or more chapters focus on him or her including characters at the periphery, such as True Belle and Golden Boy. At the end of improvisation, the audience usually applauds the solo performer; at the end of the chapter about True Belle and Golden Gray, the readers should be applauding because the solo performances have allowed the disparate parts to come together—the mystery behind Joe’s birth is revealed. The final chapter is the narrator uniting the events through conclusion and relating what becomes of the soloists. The narrator reminds that he or she has been leading the readers through this piece of feeling with one last description: “Pain, I seem to have an affection, a kind of sweettooth for it. [. . .] And although the pain is theirs, I share it, don’t I? Of course. Of course. I wouldn’t have it any other way” (219). The narrator reminds readers that they should have felt the pain along the way, but then soothes that pain with a return to normalcy for the characters with no more improvisation or soloing.       

            In a radio broadcast in the 1950s, Stan Kenton described jazz as “a distinct music that depends and thrives on individuality and yet the individual is not oblivious to others nor is he immune to their feelings.” Morrison’s Jazz is structured in the same way; the characters all have very different backgrounds that have influenced the individuals that they have become in New York City in 1925-1926. But their lives, regardless of their backgrounds, have become intertwined, and when one character becomes immune to the feelings of another, Joe to Violet or Dorcas to Joe, the swing ends and disharmony ensues until the jazz swing is reestablished. Morrison’s novel Jazz embodies Kenton’s conclusion that “[a]ll phases of life's emotions are felt and experienced in jazz.”

Morrison, Toni. Jazz. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 1992. Print.

Time and Redemption

Within Toni Morrison’s novel “Jazz,” there is a sense of redemption that could be felt by looking back towards the past. The novel centers around Joe and Violet, and older couple living in Harlem. The story slowly progresses around the events of Joe having an affair on his wife, which ends with him shooting the girl he was spending time with. While focusing on the fallout of this decision, the reader is given consistent flashbacks on each character, and while not all of them get the redemption the reader may or may not like, it allows for them to have a better dimension in understanding their actions.

The first person to really look at is Joe. When you first meet him, he seems like a bit of a low life. A 50 year old man that cheated on his wife and shot his lover. He is then seen in constant mourning over the girl, leaving Violet to struggle with her emotions of what happened on her own. With the flashbacks we get of Joe though, the story shifts dramatically for him where he comes close to being able to garner sympathy from the reader. Joe is shown to be a lonely man, earlier on, slowly drifting away from his wife even though he still loved her, and wanted the love of another woman to share his thoughts and feelings with. In this area we get Dorcas, who steps in as the emotional love support that Joe needs.

With Joe’s past that we see in the flashbacks, it’s also found that he’s a simple and kind country boy from before. His mother was named Wild, on the account of her being wild, and leaves him with Hunters Hunter to take care of him before finding him a new family. Joe is then raised by this family with the constant wonder of what happened to his parents. As Joe grows older, he does odd jobs to earn money and eventually meets Violet by coming close to “falling into her lap.” The flashbacks of Joe allow for the reader to sympathize with him over his poor past and his life struggles. By going over pivotal moments in his life, Morrison does a great job in taking away the picture of him as just an old murderer who had an affair, and gives him depth. It helps for the reader to understand why he was so broken after he killed Dorcas.

We then get the same sense of Violet’s character by these flashbacks. Although she gains the nickname Violent, on the account of trying to attack the corpse of Dorcas, the reader sees her as someone that is partially crazy. She has moments where she sits down in the street, nearly steals a baby, and even consistently visits Dorcas’s aunt even after she disrupted the funeral. This early portrayal of Violet makes it hard for the reader to fully understand anything other than the fact that she may be crazy. It makes sense why she would, she’s stuck with a grieving husband that forgets about her and only cares about the death of his lover. Again though, Morrison’s use of temporal play allows the reader to have a better background on Violet.

It’s learned that at an early age Violet’s family suffered from poverty. After her father left her mother and allowed for people to repossess their home, she’s forced to live in a shack. Her mother gives up on life and eventually even commits suicide by jumping in a well. The reader finds that Violet is forced to grow up in this rough lifestyle. Anything her mother owned until True Belle came to help assist the family was simply handouts from neighbors that felt pity towards her, her sisters, and her mother. As Violet gets older she is forced to leave, which ends up with her meeting Joe. Although not too much detail is given between when Violet and Joe get married and when they leave for the city, the reader finds out that even then the two characters struggle in the South. There is mention that Joe buys land and has to take jobs throughout the county, which leaves Violet working many of the same types of jobs that Joe does. By the time they do leave for the city, Violet is described to be like a man that works in the fields. She has muscles most women wouldn’t have, callused hands and feet, and works enough hours that when she does get home, she falls asleep without being able to take off both the boots she wears.

These plays with time, through the means of flashbacks, allow for the reader’s to have a greater understanding of both Joe’s and Violet’s actions moving forward. The hard past that they lived in the south tend to come back up within their time in the city. Joe was a hunter; he is referred to as “hunting” Dorcas when he goes to find where she’s at. Even while he goes to find her he refers back to the moral code he was taught: never shoot a baby, never shoot a female, never hunt a person. Although he breaks these moral codes, which Dorcas could technically qualify for all three, he does it as an accidental act of passion. Without these callbacks though, the reader would be left with questions and assumptions about the characters.

It is also worth mentioning that it isn’t just Joe and Violet that get these flashbacks as well. Morrison mixes them in with each major character she presents. With Dorcas, she speaks about how her parents were lost in the St. Louis riots, which leads to how she fell into the care of her aunt. We see how strict her aunt is on her upbringing, not allowing her to do a lot of the things, or wear many of the clothes, that girls her age were doing and wearing. This strict upbringing that Morrison gives the reader insight to let’s them have a better understanding on why a young girl would bother with sleeping with a 50 year old man. We also get a look at her aunt, although only brief glimpses, to her past as well. Her aunt ended up in the same situation as Violet, with her husband cheating on her, and Morrison does a great job showing the different kind of mental break that she went through over Violet.

The final things these flashbacks do is allow for Morrison to show how different stories and characters can connect. There are times where in the flashbacks she would introduce new characters. By doing so, she expands on their history with a different flashback. Each flashback finds a way to connect to one another. These connections lead back to the current time and reflects on the mental states where Joe and Violet are at in the present. By doing this temporal play, Morrison allows herself the ability to create and take away characters, while also building each one into a three dimension person that her audience can either relate to, or understand. In the end, no matter how big or small, she allows for each character to find a means of redemption, even if it's a call back to how they acted in the past.