In Chronoschisms
Heise discusses the “urge on all sides of the political and theoretical spectrum
to declare conventional and high-modernist modes of reasoning about time
inadequate and outdated. In some cases, this urge expresses itself in a clear
tendency toward the hyperbolic” (30). Heise argues the relevancy of bypassing
complicated theoretical paradoxes of temporality in favor of metaphors, such as
“Jameson’s association of the postmodern time sense with schizophrenia…[, as]
the new temporal realities do not seem to fit readily into the vocabulary that
non-technical language puts at the writer’s disposal” (31).
Writers that experiment with language as it pertains
to constructions of identity and meaning, such as constructionists (Barthes,
Saussure, Strauss) and deconstructionists (Derrida, Spivak, Bhabha, Butler) either
must use the existing lexicon available to them (and the world at large) or
coin terms, such as differance, essentialism, mimicry and mockery, etc. The
poststructuralist’s manner of critiquing the ways in which humankind constructs
meaning through language is similar to the methods that postmodern authors
construct their text—through the use of hyperbole, used in this sense to mean
magnification rather than a gross over-exaggeration.
Heise’s view of
hyperbolic representations of temporality gave me new perspective on postmodern
narratives. Extravagant metaphorical representations used to encourage critical
thinking illustrate the hyperbolic nature of postmodern texts: Octavia Butler’s
emphasis (in Kindred) on the psychological
implications of traveling to (and interfering with) a historically turbulent
and personal moment of time, rather than the theory of time travel itself;
Margaret Piercy’s ambitiously didactic exploration of a future in Woman on the Edge of Time, mysteriously
tapped into by an imaginative and overwrought young woman, wherein gender,
sexuality, and race are no longer subject to binary oppositions; Toni Morrison’s
use of parallel timeframes, her rhythmic depiction of the collective search for African
American self-identity (rooted in the past), and the necessity of love and
forgiveness in Jazz; Julia Alvarez’
use of reverse chronology and the fragmentation that occurs when one is
psychologically torn between cultures in How
the Garcia Girls Lost their Accents; and Kate Atkinson’s Life After Life, which “plays” with the
notion of eternal recurrence.
Kate Atkinson notably
includes an epigraph from Nietzsche’s TheGay Science, which analyzes the human reaction to the possibility of
eternal recurrence—Dread or Acceptance. The way Atkinson constructs her novel
reflects postmodernity’s frequent discussions not only about the nature of time,
but the place of humankind within a cyclical system of temporality wherein we
have the power (if only we could tap into it) to change (or simply to delay)
the future.
In order to accomplish
the feat of writing a novel, treatise, script, etc., that artistically
questions the nature of temporal reality—or any other topic that clashes with
the senses—as we know it, the use of hyperbole is a necessity. People that think
of themselves as rational, logical, and literal may scoff at notions of eternal
recurrence and classifications such as posthistory, poststructuralism,
deconstructionism, and postmodernism, and yet there seems to be no manner of straightforward
analysis that aids our understanding or our ability to cope with the
complexities of the world in which we live.
The common (mis)interpretation
of Occam’s razor today, that the
simplest answer is most often correct, has always struck me as false. Avoiding
needlessly complicating issues by relying upon preconceived notions, irrelevant
assumptions, and post hoc fallacies makes perfect sense, but claiming that in
simplicity lies Truth is borderline delusional. In order to make sense of the
world and our subjective place within it, time must inevitably be pondered, and
by utilizing hyperbolic techniques that emphasize (yet paradoxically help to
explain) essential enigmas, authors help to aid in the process of awareness on
a grand scale.
Awesome essay. Taking hyperbole to mean magnification instead of an exaggeration really helped me put the whole notion into perspective a lot more clearly. The representations of temporal discontinuity in postmodern novels, particularly the ones we have read this semester, were floating around in my head the entire time I read Heise's work, and you fleshed them out nicely, if I do say so myself.
ReplyDeleteWhen I teach about the shift to postmodern literature, I use the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as the historical event that precipitated postmodernism; as a society, I'm sure it seemed to be an exaggeration that one country held a single weapon that could kill 39,000 (Nagasaki) to 66,000 (Hiroshima) people. Society was probably already struggling to comprehend 6 million people exterminated over a period of five year. Hyperbole was certainly the necessary tool for postmodern literature because any outcome was now possible. Conversely, a desire to do the impossible, change time to change outcomes, also seems to be a logical desire.
ReplyDelete