In Nella Larsen’s 1929 novel Passing, Larsen blends the lines between racial identity and the
construction of the self, never quite making room for her characters to understand
the implications of identifying as black and
white, black or white, or neither
black nor white. By never defining
these lines, readers are caught between the past, present, and future. The
multiple aspects of identity make it difficult to recognize what’s happening
within each character, regardless of the fairly straight-forward timeline.
Larsen does manage to do all of this in a mostly
chronological fashion. With the exception of one chapter in which Irene reimagines
an earlier meeting with Clare Kendry, the novel begins with Clare’s letter and
ends with her death—what happens between these moments is what fuels the
narrative.
It could be argued that Passing
is a product of its time—Larsen was well-aware of both race and gender expectations
in the United States’ society, specifically in regard to Harlem, where the
events of Passing take place. As many
of the characters in Larsen’s text are victims of their environment (as the
rise of performativity, passing, and playing “white” are all linked to the
connections between the city and identity throughout the novel), it is surprising
that in Toni Morrison’s Jazz, each
character’s feelings towards Harlem are much different than that of Larsen’s
characters. There are countless passages that detail not only the characters’
love for “the City,” but also numerous accounts that place Harlem in a position
of autonomous power. Morrison writes:
And the
City, in its own way, gets down for you, cooperates, smoothing its sidewalks,
correcting its curbstones, offering you melons and green apples on the corner.
Racks of yellow head scarves; strings of Egyptian beads. Kansas fried chicken
and something with raisins call attention to an open window where the aroma
seems to lurk. And if that's not enough, doors to speakeasies stand ajar and in
that cool dark place a clarinet coughs and clears its throat waiting for the
woman to decide on the key. She makes up her mind and as you pass by informs
your back that she is daddy's little angel child. The City is smart at this:
smelling and good and looking raunchy; sending secret messages disguised as
public signs: this way, open here, danger to let colored only single men on
sale woman wanted private room stop dog on premises absolutely no money down
fresh chicken free delivery fast. And good at opening locks, dimming stairways.
Covering your moans with its own. (63-4)
Morrison’s depiction of Harlem is of much more than a city:
it is described as its own thinking, capable being, which is what I think
separates Morrison’s novel from Passing. This
acceptance of Harlem, through the flashbacks and moments where the narrative
temporarily steps way, allows Morrison to bring her characters’ pasts together
and bind them into one community. Morrison is able to highlight performativity in
ways that seem far-fetched from Larsen’s depictions, not because the novel is
contemporary, thus removed from the restraints of its time period, but because
Morrison breathes life into an otherwise suffocating and restrictive city—the
Harlem that eventually takes Clare Kendry’s life.
Albrecht-Crane argues that in Jazz, “Morrison points to the process of
constructing race and its deployment—its performative dimension… [she]
illustrates how individuals ‘become’ black in a performative way that
juxtaposes ‘acting black’ to ‘acting white’”(59). Similar to how Larsen
constructs Clare Kendry, the characters of Jazz
are caught between these moments where performativity—whether it be white
or black—is a necessary action.
For Larsen, time is merely a way
of measuring the growth of each character. As Irene and Clare grow older, time
changes them—up until the point that Clare falls off the balcony to her death
and Irene collapses moments after, as if a piece of herself has just been destroyed.
Despite the constant struggle regarding identity construction throughout the
novel, time moves linearly. Readers are able to observe who Irene and Clare are
at the beginning of the book, as well as how they change throughout the course
of the novel until the final scenes.
For Morrison, however, time
operates in its own cycle. Through each flashback and the changes in
point-of-view, there is an obvious sequence of change. Because the reader is
not fed the narrative one linear event after another, it becomes more difficult
for the reader to determine the construction of identity within each character.
For example, Joe struggles with his own identity, believing his own parents
abandoned him and thus growing up under an adoptive family. After Henry hints
that Wild might be Joe’s mother, he tracks her down, eager in his hunt for the
missing puzzle pieces of his own identity, but unfortunately, cannot initially
confirm his lineage.
Moments such as these bring
additional thought into Morrison’s “performative dimension.” In Passing, perhaps Clare and Irene are so
unhappy, not because Clare insists on passing, but because the two women know
where they come from—they recognize their mothers and fathers and are able to
connect with their community through this sense of being, but feel trapped in
such moments of definiteness. In Jazz, however,
many of the characters fit the in-between: children who grow up without any
knowledge of their parents, children of one free parent and one slave parent, and/or
children who inhabit a space where they are black and white, black or white,
or neither black nor white simultaneously.
Because neither the characters nor the reader has any knowledge of the past
(other than what is blatantly exposed), identity can only be constructed
through the unfamiliarity of the present.
No comments:
Post a Comment